Blind Prophecy

In a few corners of the gay blogophere today, the discussion is heating up on whether or not California should try to revoke Prop 8 with the 2010 general election ballot. Some activists are already gearing up to gather signatures to put the question of marriage equality before the voters of California again as soon as possible. Others, like political consultant Chad Griffin, speaking at last weekend’s Equality Summit in Los Angeles, disagree. “There is one thing worse than losing Prop. 8,” said Griffin, “and that would be losing again.”

I think both perspectives have validity, but I fall on the side of bringing the issue forward again and again as soon as possible and as often as necessary. First, the queer community’s response to the passage of Prop 8 has created a nationwide level of activism that should be tapped before it completely dissipates. Second, it will take the issue away from the endless debate about government powers and the role of courts versus the will of the people. Third, marriage equality approved by the voters would be considered more legitimate than equality achieved by other means. Fourth, the fallout of Prop 8 in 2008 means that certain elements such as the religious funding and mobilization for hate will be under a microscope in another round of campaigning and will be harder for them to deny and hide from the public.

So I say, let’s lose again, if that’s what happens. Let’s lose in 2010, 2012, 2014… every two years until we don’t lose. We’ll call them “practice” elections until we finally tip the balance and achieve equality.

Filed under: queer rights by Jere Keys