Comments on: Action and Inaction in Queer Rights

By: josh

josh — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:59:30 +0000

I tink we all need to listen to "The Climb" a couple hundred timez and stay hopeful!

By: David

David — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:58:32 +0000

Le sigh.

By: gobliinbox

gobliinbox — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:33:16 +0000

Isn’t it funny (funny-peculiar, not funny-haha), the whole “as long as it’s not marriage” stance?

I really don’t get it. If it looks like a marriage, acts like a marriage, and talks like a marriage, that’s okay. AS LONG AS WE DON’T CALL IT A MARRIAGE, because that’s sacred and just between str8 people and God.

*headdesk*

Oh well, whatever gets them through the night.

By: Tam

Tam — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:53:17 +0000

Well, each small step is a positive step. Hopefully NY will get their act together and stop trying to avoid the issue.

By: Jere Keys

Jere Keys — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:14:40 +0000

If backed into a corner, but not willingly.

By: Polt

Polt — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:08:39 +0000

Very interesting. but I have to wonder, would they support domestic partnerships, granting all the rights of marriage, but calling it another name?

HUGS…

By: Jere Keys

Jere Keys — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:52:10 +0000

But Salt Lake is not the rest of Utah. It’s a calm oasis of relatively liberal values in a vast desert of insane. In fact, Salt Lake City officials often campaign on who is the most gay-friendliest. The most surprising thing in this article is that the church has softened its stance from “STONE THEM!!!!!” to “as long as it’s not about marriage.” I suspect that it’s 99% public relations damage control (like the late 70s revelation that Black people can be fully participating members of the Church).

By: gobliinbox

gobliinbox — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:12:52 +0000

Seriously astounded about Salt Lake City. Mormons hate fags. Just like all the other insane crazy Xian splinter factions that make up our great country.

Okay, not all of them. But you know what I mean.