Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes.

Meta


What's this?

Online home and blog of Jere Keys, a 30-something queer activist, writer, aspiring lawyer and all-around decent human being living in Cincinnati and currently underemployed.

Site menu:

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this blog are entirely those of the author and in no way reflect the views, opinions or beliefs of any organization, business or group with which I am affiliated.

Countdown

  • Bush Leaves the White House in 137 days

What I've been up to (via friendfeed)

Thinking it's time for a trip to the library.

Friday 15:32

It's sort of like rain, only more misty.

Friday 13:59

Sigh. I need a job ASAP or I'm going to have to cancel my New York trip in two weeks or miss this month's student loans payment.

Friday 13:24

New blog... Liveblogging the RNC, McCain Speech http://tinyurl.com/5l4tw3

Friday 0:54

I've been spam-tweeting my reactions to the RNC in my new twitter account for liveblogging events: jerekeys_live

Thursday 23:25

Back from a 2 hour walk. I may have the emotional fortitude to sit through one last night of RNC crap.

Thursday 20:05

Links:


Categories +/-

Archive +/-

Links +/-

Meta +/-

queer rights

Congress begins hearings on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” tomorrow

To put tomorrow’s hearings in perspective, here’s a clip that sums up my thoughts…


‘Gays Too Precious To Risk In Combat,’ Says General

While I believe that all people should have equal access to joining or participating in any institution (from marriage to war-mongering), it’s hard for me to get terribly excited about my fellow queers being shipped off to fight a war I don’t believe in.

Want Gay Back? Too Bad

It seems that 2-3 times a year, someone makes news by writing an editorial or giving an interview in which they proclaim that they “want the word ‘gay’ back.” Most recently, it popped up on The Daily Show (around the 4:30 mark).

As a self-appointed leader at times within the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community, I think I speak for all (or most) of us when I say, no. No, you cannot take the word back.

Even though I’m personally a fan of using the word queer for it’s grander scope of inclusion and radical political connotations in current society, I’m not letting go of ‘gay’ either.

Partly because language changes and evolves and there’s nothing you or I can do about it (unless, of course, you think that God made all languages after some ancient desert tribes built a really big tower and they’ve remained the same ever since because any other ideas about where languages came from is just a big unproved “theory” and you’ve got your faith to fall back on).

Partly because if we give back ‘gay’ what will you want next and what will you leave us? Will you want ‘queer’ as well? How about ‘faggot’? Where’s the cranky old man demanding that we give back the words ‘fruit’ ‘fairy’ ‘queen’ and ‘pansy’? And then what’s left to us? The incredibly clinical ‘homosexual’ which some still associate with violent reparative therapy? Other choice turns of phrase like ‘pederast’ and ‘pervert’ and ’sodomite’?

But my biggest objection to ‘giving back’ the word is the usually subtle but sometimes overt homophobia in the request. We’ve gone and ruined a perfectly good word, haven’t we. Now, when you say that the children were gay in anticipation of the trip to Disneyland, it sounds dirty and inappropriate, doesn’t it? It only sounds dirty and wrong because we still think that gay sex and gay people are somehow shameful and disgusting.

So here’s the deal, when you can describe your children as gay without cringing at the homosexual double entendre, then maybe we’ll let you have your word back. When you can announce that you’re feeling gay today in a room full of you buddies, it’s all yours. You want your word back, go ahead and try to take it.

I don’t know which is more tedious, that every couple months some asshole thinks he’s had an original thought as he pens an editorial on this topic, or that they’re inevitably blind to the rancid bigotry underlying their impassioned plea to take back a word that has come to be associated with my community.

Pride Weekend Wrap-up

I decided to stay close to home on Saturday rather than hitting the Dyke March and Pink Party. I just wasn’t in much of a mood for crowds. Instead, I had one of the best Caesar salads in the city at L’s Caffe and finished reading my first for-fun book since starting to study for the LSAT.

The Harlequin by Laurell K. Hamilton… I’m happy to report that LKH is finally giving us some plot that isn’t sex, sex, sex. This book comes the closest to capturing the tone and feel of her early Anita Blake books that I enjoyed so much. It’s not that she’s done away with the sex, it’s that it doesn’t overwhelm the plot… which features Anita solving a crime and fighting new monsters. It almost makes me want to go ahead and read the next book in hardcover. I won’t, but I’m glad to see LKH getting this series back on track. (See some of my previous Anita Blake series comments here and here)

Anyway, on to the big event…

Sunday morning I slept in until a reasonable weekend hour and made my way downtown without rush, which was a novel experience in itself. No rushing to meet up with friends, no being in charge of anything, no plans and no drama. I didn’t even care if I saw the whole thing. Even so, I still got to the Parade with time to spare. I stationed myself near the grandstand and was able to watch about 3 hours of parade. The weather went from gray and overcast to sunny and warm while I was standing there getting sunburned because I didn’t think I’d need sunscreen.

San Francisco Pride Parade

After the parade, I made my way into the Festival for a little while. I quickly came to the realization that without a radio in my hand or friends to entertain, I have no idea what to do at Pride. I wandered by some booths, had a couple drinks, talked to a few cute guys, then called it a day. In fact, I had time to go to the gym, do some shopping (groceries and new sunglasses), and head home for an early evening with Safeway sushi for dinner.

Anyway, there are a buttload (bigger than an assload, smaller than a truckload) of photos from the parade after the jump…
Read more »

Trans March Report

The Trans March was cool. There was a lot of anti-HRC sentiment being expressed because of their ENDA strategy. The other big topic, of course, was the current American Psychiatric Association’s Committee on Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders for the revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V). Many trans activists want Gender Identity Disorder removed from the list of mental disorders and treated as a physical medical issue instead. I agree.

Also, I was a good ally today. As the march was getting underway, I picked the same spot for watching and taking pictures as a bunch of reporters. They were looking at signs that said “Burn the DSM” and had no idea what it meant. Thank goodness I’m one of those professional queers who pays attention to these sorts of things, because I was able to give them some background on the current controversy and stress its importance.

My favorite part of the rally and march, though, was Margaret Cho’s appearance. I was right in front of the stage and could totally make out her nipples through the hoodie she was wearing (it was cold and windy - there were a lot of visible nips).

Anyway, some video and photos…


2008 San Francisco Trans March

2008 San Francisco Trans March

2008 San Francisco Trans March

2008 San Francisco Trans March

2008 San Francisco Trans March

2008 San Francisco Trans March

2008 San Francisco Trans March

2008 San Francisco Trans March

See all 73 photos.

I’m not feeling very nice today…

You know, there are days when I really, really want to stop playing nice. The LDS Church is asking members to “do all you can to support the proposed constitutional amendment [banning marriage equality in California] by donating of your means and time.”

EDITED: I’ve deleted three paragraphs of angry and unpleasant things I had to say about the Mormon religion. Suffice it to say, if there was any lingering interest I might have ever had with reconciling with the LDS church (there wasn’t), it’s gone.

Family

Another Typical Weekend

Bitstrips - Another Typical Weekend

The strip is, once again, based on a true story.

Also, I love this video…

Jeffery Self on Gay Marriage

Sorry, not much point to today’s blog entry, is there?

The Day After May 15, 2008

I came out to myself and my close friends in the summer of 1996.

It was September 1996 when President Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act into law.

My entire life as an out gay man has been involved in this struggle, the fight for marriage equality.

In 2000 I became a professional homosexual, working first with queer youth, then on the Nevada “No on 2″ Campaign, fighting unsuccessfully to keep discrimination out of the Nevada Constitution. In 2001-2002, I remained on the board of Equal Rights Nevada, continuing the “No on 2″ fight.

In November of 2003, I editorialized and celebrated the Massachusetts Judicial Supreme Court ruling, although the east coast seemed as foreign to me then as Europe or Asia.

In February 2004, I tuned in daily for news coverage of the amazing events in San Francisco after the dashing mayor Gavin Newsom ordered city officials to issue same-sex marriage licenses in violation of state law.

In October 2004, I moved to Utah just as the voters overwhelmingly chose to amend the state consitution to ban gay people from marriage or any other form of legal recognition.

Then I moved to California, where I live today. Where I lived yesterday, May 15, 2008, when the news broke that the California Supreme Court overturned the ban on same-sex marriage.

And it’s a game-changer, folks, for many reasons. Unlike Massachusetts and it’s archaic residency rules rooted in racist laws, California doesn’t have any limits on who can get married and from which states. The reason for the Justices’ decision, applying the strict scrutiny doctrine instead of rational basis, is significant in setting legal precedent (and has implications far beyond marriage equality within California). It’s often repeated, because it’s largely true, that as California goes, so goes the nation. There will be important and potentially national implications from the lawsuits coming out of this decision (who do you want picking the next Supreme Court Justices?).

So what’s my point? Why this rambling personal history?

Yesterday and today, I saw something remarkable. In the faces of my friends and coworkers and strangers and acquaintances, I saw a happiness and joy that is new.

Have you ever been given a new prescription for glasses that was much different from your last prescription? Do you remember putting on those new glasses for the first time and thinking “so that’s what it’s supposed to look like? I had forgotten.”? Or maybe you’ve been given a raise and for the first time you have money left in your bank account when the next check comes. Or maybe you’ve suddenly found medicine that effectively treats a long-standing medical issue? Or had surgery to correct a problem you’ve suffered for a long time?

For me, for so many of us, it’s like we’ve suddenly been healed of a wound we didn’t know we had. Really.

As well-adjusted and proud of my sexual orientation as I am… as mentally healthy and filled with self-esteem as any of are… there’s a subtle internalized hurt that comes when the law does not recognize you as a full citizen. Anyone who belongs to a group that has been disenfranchised knows what I’m talking about, or would if they examined themselves closely. Yesterday, the California Supreme Court gave hundreds of thousands of queer people an official “hey, you’re okay” that has been long overdue.

Even though I’m not in a relationship now, even though I’m not sure I ever want to get married (legal or no), even though I suspect the legal and cultural fight is long from over… there’s a simple and heartbreaking joy in my soul today. I’ve seen the people celebrating in the Castro, I’ve seen the images from Los Angeles, San Diego, Sacramento, and beyond as emotions have ranged from open weeping with joy to ecstatic displays of happiness.

And it simply boggles the mind that anyone wants to take that away.

I can’t understand the cruelty, the lack of basic human empathy, and the willful blindness it takes to see such expressions of love, or to be near and to sense the change in dignity and emotion, and not to be moved. I don’t understand people of faith who see queer folks experiencing such transformational bliss and dismiss it as disgusting or evil or a threat to society. What unhappiness stains their souls that they cannot share in this feeling? What jealousy corrupts their lives that they cannot be happy for the love and dignity and gladness of others?

I went to work this morning as I do most mornings. Even us professional homosexuals had to punch in this morning. I still had to deal with office politics and disappointments, I still had deadlines crashing down around me. The day was too hot and we kept the lights off in the office to keep the heat down. I had to squeeze in a few hours of study before my next LSAT diagnostic tomorrow.

On the surface, nothing much has changed.

But I know that as early as June 14, I could meet a boy and say, “have you ever just wanted to be crazy impulsive and get married to a stranger?” And somehow, it makes a world of difference.

p.s. If anyone forgot, May 15 was also the anniversary of Rev. Jerry “AIDS is not just God’s punishment for homosexuals; it is God’s punishment for the society that tolerates homosexuals” Falwell’s death. Is it too soon to declare May 15 an official queer holiday?

I Can Get Married (Theoretically)

By a 4-3 vote, the California Supreme Court has overturned the ban on same-sex marriage in California. I’ve just skimmed the 172 page written decision (PDF) for the office - shouting our relevant quotes and news as I encountered them, reading the final holding aloud to cheers throughout the office.

i’m so happy to be a Californian today. Now I just need someone to get hitched to!

Pansies

In endorsing Hillary Clinton, North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley said, “…this lady right here makes Rocky Balboa look like a pansy.”

Some bloggers recognize this for what it is - an anti-gay slur being used in political discourse by a member of the “friendly” party.

But all day long I’ve been hearing that I’m too easily offended, that I’m being too sensitive, that it’s just a word with multiple meanings and I’m choosing to focus on only one meaning (an offensive synonym for gay - it’s in the dictionary, I’m not making this up).

Here are some other words Governor Easley might have chosen without causing much disturbance, “weakling” “wimp” “lightweight” “coward” or “helpless”

And here are some alternative words he did not choose (righty so) because they are too obviously insensitive to minority groups: “pussy” “feeb” “sissy” “bitch” or “wuss”

Okay, fine, but using the logic that I’m intentionally looking to be offended, here are some other words that have multiple meanings, and it seems unfair that I focus on the negative derogatory one when children are being shot and killed because it’s generally okay to express anti-gay prejudice.

Faggot

Fruit


Fudge Packers

Nancy Boys

Queen

Sissy

Fairy

Pansy

Regardless of whether Governor Easley meant his remark to offend queer people or not, he needs to apologize. Like a score of racially-charged words, gender or ability-biasing words, and other subtle uses of language that reinforce institutionalized power systems, it’s time for “pansy” as a derogatory phrase to be added to the permanent “no-no” list.

Don’t poke the transphobes

Note to self: Do not engage in debates with assholes in the comments of popular blogs. Do Not Engage. DO NOT ENGAGE! DO NOT ENGAGE!

This lesson is brought to you by anti-transgender assholes, anonymous trolls, and David Letterman’s #1 in the “Top Ten Messages left on the pregnant man’s answering machine.”

Thomas Beatie, a transman, recently told his story in The Advocate. Basically, because his wife couldn’t have a child, he stopped taking hormone (testosterone) treatment so that he could get pregnant through artificial insemination. Beatie will be on Oprah today, so I’m sure we’ll hear more about it.

Look, I see it quite simply, calling someone a “freakshow” based on their gender identity, the way they create a family, or for having the courage to openly discuss the things that make them “different” is uncalled for and offensive. That I even have to defend this point of view is appalling. Even more so when I have to defend these ideas with gay men who only weeks ago were upset at the death of Lawrence King.